M&A

"This represents both the main upside and downside risk for Glencore"

Glencore's Hail Creek acquisition to revitalise its metallurgical coal portfolio

Staff reporter
The acquisition of a majoirty stake in Hail Creek will benefit Glencore, Wood Mackenzie said

The acquisition of a majoirty stake in Hail Creek will benefit Glencore, Wood Mackenzie said

Wood Mackenzie said the US$1.7 billion price tag was at a 41% premium to its valuation for Hail Creek. It assumed a zero valuation for the Valeria project.

The premium paid implied a long-term benchmark hard coking coal price of $146 per tonne and a benchmark thermal coal price of $83/t, signalling confidence in higher for longer prices.

The inclusion of Hail Creek is expected to boost Glencore's met coal output by 67% from 2017 to 15 million tonnes in 2019, although this volume excluded the impact of not-yet-finalised deals relating to its Coal & Allied 49% Hunter Valley Operations acquisition and the sale of Tahmoor in New South Wales to the GFG Alliance.

Hail Creek produced 5.25 million tonnes of hard coking coal in 2017, of which Rio's share was 4.3Mt. 

It pointed out that the company's hard coking coal production profile had been declining after the closure of the Oaky No. 1 mine last year, the winding down of coking coal production from the Newlands Coal assets in Queensland and the sale of Tahmoor.

The acquisition would also add marginal volume to the miner's Australian thermal coal output, with Hail Creek producing a high-ash (25%) product.

Thermal coal production from Hail Creek in 2017 was 4.1Mt, of which Rio's share was 3.4Mt.

"It also offers a longer-term opportunity to develop Valeria as a replacement for its Clermont thermal coal mine which is estimated to close in 2026," WoodMac said.

The consultancy noted the deal would increase Glencore's margins, with it estimating a total average post-deal margin of $64/t for met coal and $37/t for thermal coal in 2018.

"Even though we estimate Hail Creek to lie within the fourth quartile of the seaborne metallurgical coal cost curve, it attracts a very good return due to its high quality," it said.

WoodMac pointed out that the mine's high-ash thermal coal attracted a healthy margin because it only had processing and re-handling costs, with no mining costs associated with this product, which was derived from coarse plant rejects.

"The value of the assets is highly sensitive to price and this represents both the main upside and downside risk for Glencore," WoodMac said.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Journal Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Journal Intelligence team.

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Journal Intelligence Global Leadership Report 2024: Net Zero

Gain insights into decarbonisation trends and strategies from interviews with 20+ top mining executives and experts plus an industrywide survey.

editions

Mining Journal Intelligence Project Pipeline Handbook 2024

View our 50 top mining projects, handpicked using a unique, objective selection process from a database of 450+ global assets.

editions

Mining Journal Intelligence Investor Sentiment Report 2024

Survey revealing the plans, priorities, and preferences of 120+ mining investors and their expectations for the sector in 2024.